<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mean Green &#187; Foam Gaskets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com/tag/foam-gaskets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com</link>
	<description>Mean Green BioFuels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Energetic About Saving Energy?</title>
		<link>http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com/whos-energetic-about-saving-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com/whos-energetic-about-saving-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biofuels News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Energy Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foam Gaskets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com/whos-energetic-about-saving-energy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009 the average, American household spent $2,200 annually on energy; and approximately half of that money was for heating and cooling. However, washing clothes in cold water saves money because up to 90% of the cost of washing clothes comes from heating water. Changing the thermostat by a degree for 8 hours a day [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/cc/biofuels_news10.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/cc/biofuels_news10.jpg" title='biofuels news' alt='biofuels news' /></a></div>
<div align="justify"><br/><br/>In 2009 the average, American household spent $2,200 annually on energy; and approximately half of that money was for heating and cooling. However, washing clothes in cold water saves money because up to 90% of the cost of washing clothes comes from heating water. Changing the thermostat by a degree for 8 hours a day &#8211; while homeowners are at work or asleep &#8211; saves 2% on heating or cooling. Sealing electric outlets in exterior walls with inexpensive foam gaskets keeps heated or cooled air from leaking out. It seems being energetic saves energy.<br/><br/>California will be the first state to save energy by imposing energy efficiency standards for televisions. As televisions increased in size, residential energy use attributed to televisions increased from 3%-4% in the 1990&#8242;s to 8%-10% in 2008. If nothing was done, the percentage was expected to reach 18% by 2023. As of January 2011, however, televisions 58 inches and smaller must consume 33% less electricity. By 2013 they must consume 49% less. Considering these new energy standards are expected to save California consumers $1 billion annually, the California Energy Commission&#8217;s unanimous vote put vision into television.<br/><br/>New vision is responsible for getting more natural gas from shale. Because of a combination of horizontal drilling and water fracturing (water and sand forced into rock at high pressure to open tiny cracks), U.S. natural gas reserves are 35% higher than previously thought. For example, a shale formation from New York to West Virginia is believed to hold 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas &#8211; equal to 80 billion barrels of oil. Natural gas is cheaper than oil and produces less carbon dioxide than coal, but it is still a fossil fuel. Thus it&#8217;s being thought of as a transition fuel &#8211; not as energy&#8217;s last gas-p.<br/><br/>What the U.S. needs is sustainable fuel and E. coli can provide it. The same microbe in the news for tainting food can produce biodiesel fuel. Scientists at a San Francisco-based company have genetically engineered E. coli to excrete biodiesel. Because the excreted fatty acids are almost like conventional hydrocarbon fuels, delivering this new fuel to consumers wouldn&#8217;t require any changes from the present system of delivering gas. Large scale commercialization is expected by 2013 at a competitive price with oil at $40-$50 a barrel. In reshaping the world&#8217;s fuel supply efficient, economical, sustainable E. coli could be a driving force.<br/><br/><br/></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.meangreenbiofuels.com/whos-energetic-about-saving-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

