Mean Green

Biomass is any organic material that is made by plants and animals. This includes all parts of plants, animal flesh and excretions such as manure. Biomass in rich in energy that can be used for fuel which is called biofuel.

Fossil fuels are also a biomass since it’s believed that they come from ancient plants and animals. But usually when people speak of biomass they are talking about material produced from sources that are alive now or were recently.

Biofuel is often talked about as though it was a new technology that we can use in the future to help solve our energy supply problems. But humans have been using biofuel since the beginning of humanity. The food we eat is a form of biofuel that we wouldn’t exist without. Humans have also used plant materials such as wood wax and whale oil as a fuel to burn for heat and light for thousands of years.

Newer technologies have allowed us to use biomass for making other biofuels. Biomass can be burned to power electric generators or made into methane, alcohol or bio diesel for powering our cars. These processes are energy intensive meaning a lot of energy is lost in converting biomass into the other forms of fuel or energy. Because of this these biofuels have not been cost effective or practical.

With all the technology going into biofuel research the one form of biofuel that we have been using since ancient times still remains the most efficient and practical. Burning biomass such as wood for direct heating is still the most efficient.

Instead of focusing on trying to use biomass to fuel our cars and generate electricity we may be better off using it to heat our homes and buildings. Firewood may not be practical for most people but pellets made from wood and other biomass may be. Burning pellets is cost effective, clean and may be the most efficient way to utilize the energy in biomass.

For those who want to use biomass as a renewable energy source heating with wood or other biomass pellets are practical and economical and the technology and distribution systems are already available.

Phytoplankton, specifically algae and microalgae, could turn down the heat on the morality debate over using food crops to produce energy. Microalgae produce triglycerides that can be converted into biodiesel, and they generate yields 30-50 times that of land-based crops. They do not require large tracts of agricultural land, nor do they disrupt the food chain.

While several technological stumbling blocks to producing algal biodiesel on a commercial scale remain, the obvious benefits over other renewable fuels keep investors and researchers interested. What’s more, the obstacles are well within the reach of innovators, especially when compared to the problems surrounding other biofuels, such as the financial, environmental, and social implications of using food crops for fuel.

Biodiesel’s Attraction

Biodiesel has been gaining momentum recently because it is a domestically produced direct diesel replacement with low emissions and relatively high energy content. Biodiesel is relatively straightforward to produce from triglycerides, using well-established transesterification chemistry. The current U.S. biodiesel supply derives largely from soybeans, while a small percentage comes from the more difficult to process waste cooking oil.

Soy crops typically produce 48 gallons of oil per acre, require petroleum-based fertilizers and herbicides, and utilize both water and soil resources. It has been estimated that to replace just 15 percent of the jet fuel used by the domestic airline fleet would take a crop the size of Florida to sustain. Oilseed crops are more popular outside the U.S., particularly in Malaysia and Indonesia where palm oil is a biodiesel source. Palms produce a much higher crop yield of 638 gallons per acre, but the trade off is deforestation and “slash and burn” harvesting methods that release large amounts of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Still, the continuing deterioration of our environment from burning fossil fuels, combined with predictions that we have reached peak oil production and estimates that China and India will soon exceed the oil consumption of the U.S., are all driving forces to finding replacements to petroleum-based fossil fuels other than food crops.

Why Phytoplankton

Algae and microalgae oils can be converted into biodiesel using the same methods employed for crop seed oils. Algae can be harvested every 24-48 hours, unlike land-based crops, which have much longer growing seasons. And some microalgae have an oil content upwards of 75 percent their dry weight. The added bonus is that algae uses carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in their photosynthesis of triglycerides, meaning an algae farm can be piggy-backed onto a CO2-producing smokestack to effectively eliminate up to 90 percent of the CO2 emissions.

In 1978, the U.S. Department of Energy started the Aquatic Species Program (ASP) aimed at investigating the use of aquatic plants as energy sources. The project was terminated in 1995 when diesel prices dropped to below $1 a gallon. The project made significant contributions to the understanding of algae genetics and lipid production. The ASP cataloged 3,000 strains of algae and found 300 species suitable for oil production.

Several algal farm designs are available for cultivating algae. While the design of the ASP algae production was in open algal ponds, Japan and others researched closed photobioreactor designs. Closed photobioreactors are significantly more expensive, but they eliminate the problem of contamination with unwanted native algae strains.

Progress Is Being Seen

This past year has seen a mini-bubble in microalgae development. When GreenFuel Technology Corporation appeared on the map early 2004, microalgae biodiesel was, and still very much is, the “next big thing.” Venture capital started flowing and new start-ups began popping up seemingly overnight. Some companies jumped on board with high crop yields and low-cost scenarios, hoping to profit from the hype. While the capacity for algal biodiesel has been projected to be much larger than possible with crop seed oil, the reality is that few companies have made it past the initial demonstration stage, and no one has produced algal biodiesel on a commercially viable scale.

And with the hype often comes some shenanigans. In November of 2006 De Beers Fuel of South Africa released plans to produce feedstock for 16 billion to 24 billion liters of biofuels a year in a plant producing 144,000 liters per day of biodiesel and being run 25 days a month. It was later discovered that the large-scale plant did not exist and that the company had only 39,000 liters produced in its stocks. It has been estimated that investors lost close to $1 million each for funds that were allotted for the plant construction.

GreenFuel, the company that controls the largest segment of intellectual property in this area, is also having financial and technical difficulties. The company’s pilot plant in Arizona grew algae faster than expected, resulting in the algae dying from lack of resources. The pilot plant had to be shut down. The cost estimates from this Arizona pilot were also higher than estimated, and in July, Green Fuels cut its workforce by half.

The overall capital cost of building and operating an algae farm is higher than for other biofuels. Some experts have even said that microalgae biodiesel from a system such as GreenFuel’s will not be commercially viable unless oil prices surpass $800 a barrel, a highly unrealistic threshold.

Where The Future Lies

The great potential of algal biodiesel is coupled with large risk. Because technical hurdles to producing commercial algal biodiesel have not been overcome, the future will rely heavily on innovative new research both in academia and industry. Government subsidies and investments also will be crucial to the success of finding a suitable alternative fuel, whether based on algae or something else.

Collaborations will play an important role for the future algae biodiesel, too. Joint ventures with CO2-generating power plants, breweries and other facilities able to incorporate large algae photobioreactors will be keys to success. Algae producers should partner with established biodiesel refineries that have the know-how to take the crude triglycerides to the final biodiesel product.

Before algal microdiesel can become a viable market alternative to fossil fuel, several critical obstacles will need to be addressed. Closed photobioreactors are currently cost prohibitive. Either an open pond system that can be operated without interference from native algae or a remodeled closed system will be the most promising configuration. Whether large-scale triglyceride production from algae can be cost effective will require the controlled growth of algae and a high level of oil production. Locations for the algae farms need to be properly assessed. Availability of unused land, daytime sunlight, nighttime temperatures, and availability of CO2 are all factors that will influence success.

The major problems with crop-based biodiesel are social and environmental in nature and are unlikely to be resolved without changing the feedstock entirely. The good news is that the set-backs with algal biodiesel can most certainly be overcome with innovation and creativity. Perhaps 10 years in the future, we’ll be pulling into to a algae pump to gas up.